Name (optional):
University/College affiliation (optional):
e-mail address (optional):
(1) For
YOU PERSONALLY
,
how appropriate was the level of material?
Please select one of the following . . .
Way too elementary
Slightly too elementary
Just about right
Some parts too simple; some parts too difficult
Too much too soon
I'm still in therapy as a result of the lecture;
please slow the pace down.
(2) How do you think
OTHER PARTICIPANTS
(not you) responded to the previous
question? In other words, how difficult did other people find the lecture?
Please select one of the following . . .
Other people found it way too elementary
Other people found it slightly too elementary
Other people found it just about right
Other people found some parts too simple; some parts too difficult
Other people found it too much too soon
I have no idea how other people responsed to the lecture
(3) For
YOU PERSONALLY
,
how was the pace of the lecture?
Please select one of the following . . .
The lecture covers too much material too fast
Some parts are too rapid, but the pace is adequate.
Some parts are slow, but overall the pace is adequate.
The pace needs to be picked up.
(4)
Were you able to view the lecture materials during
the lecture using the video equipment?
Please select one of the following . . .
I could see things just fine.
The video quality was improved over previous slides.
The video quality was not adequate for some slides.
I had to rely on printed materials for the most part.
Are you guys working for optometrists on the side?
(5)
If you reviewed the lecture slides, please tell
us what you thought of the content.
Please select one of the following . . .
The slides don't "stand alone" and require explanation.
I figured a few things out, but the slides could use more explanation.
The slides had just the right amount of content.
The slides were verbose, but not to distraction.
Whoa! The slides are like a short novel. Summarize!
(6)
Are you planning on using any of the materials presented in this
lecture series (slides, other resources) in a course at your institution?
(You are welcome to, by the way.)
Please select one of the following . . .
The materials are not useful; I already have adequate materials.
Some of the materials could be adapted.
The matierials offer a good start; I will have to modify them.
Since you offered, I'll use the slides; I might change things.
I'd like to use them right out of the box.
(7)
If you had a chance to review the sample program assignment, how
useful would similar materials be for a course offered at your institution?
(The assignment was designed as a 'second program' in Java, after
an initial "warm-up" program stressing syntax).
Please select one of the following . . .
Sorry; I have not had a chance to review the sample assigment.
I might use it as a reference, but will use my own materials.
I reviewed the assignment; it's too advanced for my students.
It looks ok; I would have to modify it for my course.
With some minor editing, I could use it in my classes.
(8)
Noting the limited lecture schedule, please select a few of the
following topics you would like covered in the last two lectures
of this series.
Remote Method Invocation (RMI) -- networked objects.
Java Native Invocation (JNI) -- Using C/C++ and Java.
Common Object Request Brokerage Architecture (CORBA).
Basic Graphical User Interfaces (AWT).
Not-so Basic Graphical User Interfaces (JDK 1.2 SWING/JFC).
Lots More Graphical User Interfaces (JDK 1.2 SWING/JFC).
Animation and Images (Java 1.1.8).
Animation, Graphics and Images (JDK 1.2, Java 2D library).
Three words: Applets, applets, applets.
Network programming (sockets, TCP and UDP).