[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Clips December 10-12, 2003



Clips December 10-12, 2003

ARTICLES

Police Captain Accused of Bootleg DVD Sales
Overstock.com backs off claim of millions of addresses stolen
French PM calls for international rules to govern Internet
UK Brings in Laws to Fight Junk Email
Florida man pleads guilty in porn case
Growing concern over India's e-waste
Electronic voting no magic bullet
Rep. Putnam keeps pressure on vendors for better security
Men Face Charges Under Spam Law


*******************************
Los Angeles Times
Police Captain Accused of Bootleg DVD Sales
By Richard Winton and Monte Morin
December 10, 2003

Just days after Los Angeles Police Chief William J. Bratton pledged a crackdown on motion picture piracy, department investigators on Tuesday helped arrest an LAPD captain suspected of selling bootleg DVDs.

Julie D. Nelson, a decorated patrol captain and a 28-year veteran of the Los Angeles Police Department, was arrested at the Hollywood station following a sting operation in which she allegedly sold counterfeit film titles such as "The Cat in the Hat" to undercover officers.

Authorities said they recovered hundreds of suspected bootleg DVDs from her home in Orange County and from a friend's home in Torrance. Officials said they also recovered recording equipment at the home in Torrance.

"The message here is, it does not matter what rank you are. If you break the law, we will come after you," said Assistant Chief Jim McDonnell at a news conference after the arrest.

Nelson, who commanded the department's Harbor Division until early this year, was booked on suspicion of possessing and selling counterfeit merchandise and for failing to disclose the origins of a recording, both felonies. Nelson, 52, has been suspended with pay pending further investigation, McDonnell said.

Although LAPD internal affairs officers arranged the sting operation, Nelson was arrested by police officers from La Palma, where she lives. McDonnell said Nelson would be prosecuted by the district attorney of Orange County.

Officers began investigating Nelson after receiving a tip. They arranged to purchase DVDs from her at an Orange County business Saturday, before Nelson attended the Hollywood station's annual Christmas party, McDonnell said. He said it does not appear that Nelson sold DVDs at the Hollywood station, and it was unclear how long she might have been selling DVDs.

"She sold to people with whom she had personal relationships and people she knew," McDonnell said. Another police source described the movies recovered at her home as recent blockbusters. "You name it, she had it, whatever was hot," the source said.

The DVDs that were seized will be examined by the Encino-based Motion Picture Assn. of America, which has called for heightened enforcement of anti-piracy laws and launched a campaign to discourage the theft of movies.

Earlier this year, Nelson was shifted from the head of the Harbor Division to the No. 2 slot in Hollywood. Her new duty as a patrol captain was widely viewed as a reduction in authority.

A graduate of Cal State Fullerton, Nelson spent much of her career as an investigator, particularly of rapes and domestic violence.

She has been considered a pioneer in investigative methods. In 1994, she established one of the first emergency response programs for victims of domestic violence and served as the head of Robbery Homicide Division's rape unit.



At a news conference Friday, Bratton joined Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca, City Atty. Rocky Delgadillo and movie industry executives on the steps of Los Angeles City Hall to announce efforts to combat movie piracy.

Among other initiatives, Bratton told reporters then that he personally would keep an eye out for movie pirates and that his department would instruct movie theater employees on how to make a citizen's arrest if they found someone illegally taping a film with a camcorder.
*******************************
USA Today
Overstock.com backs off claim of millions of addresses stolen
12/9/2003 7:16 PM

SALT LAKE CITY (AP)  Overstock.com has retrenched on its claim that 3 million customer e-mail addresses had been stolen, and now puts the number in the dozens.
A company spokesman stood by the lawsuit filed Friday against an employee and her husband and said Monday that the large number of addresses mentioned in the suit was an attempt to leave the door open should an investigation reveal more damage was done than the company now believes.

The Salt Lake City-based company sells other companies' excess inventories at discounted prices over the Internet.

Rachelle and Jeffrey Knight were named in the 3rd District Court suit. It alleged they had "unlawfully (collected) more than 3 million customer e-mail addresses" from the company's customer lists and sold them to companies that send unsolicited advertising e-mails.

Public relations director Scott Blevins now says there probably were only "a few dozen" addresses involved, but it is possible more were taken.

The Knights and their attorney, Lauren Scholnick, say the accusations came "out of the blue" and may amount to nothing more than a public relations stunt on the company's part.

"This case has absolutely no basis," Scholnick said.

Rachelle Knight, 31, who was a programmer of four years at Overstock.com, said she was caught off guard when she was fired Friday and told of the allegations.

"Over and over I said, 'We did not do this,' " she said. "It was a terrible experience to be pulled in ... and told we were accused of these unethical things."

She said she never even worked from her home computer.

"We make it a point to leave work at work," Jeffrey Knight, 33, said. "We were just blown away by the whole idea of it."

But when Rachelle Knight went home Friday after being fired, she was met by a constable, two company lawyers and a company representative. The constables confiscated the Knights' personal computer.

Jeffrey Knight worked in merchandising for the company from January 2001 until he was let go in a general layoff in April 2003.

Scholnick said the lawsuit smells of a publicity stunt, that "this might be a complete scapegoating of these two people" to create the appearance the company is actively fighting to protect customer privacy.

"We are taking aggressive and proactive action," Blevins said. "But it isn't for the sake of (public relations). It is for the sake of protecting our customers and the company."

The suit claimed that two employees discovered that the Knights had accessed the company's computer network via remote access. In recent weeks, Overstock.com has received "a significantly increased" number of patron complaints about junk e-mail, the suit said.

Many of the patrons had set up separate e-mail accounts exclusively for Overstock.com use, pointing to the company's customer information bank as the source of their leak to advertisers, the suit said.
*******************************
Associated French Press
French PM calls for international rules to govern Internet
Wed Dec 10, 3:10 PM ET

GENEVA (AFP) - French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin called for "international rules" overseen by the United Nations (news - web sites) to govern the Internet.


"The information society offers new opportunities, but like all new technological revolutions it also brings uncertainty," Raffarin told the UN-sponsored World Summit on the Information Society, the world's first such meeting.


"It calls on us to establish international rules, which citizens can rely on," said the premier.


"For France, the UN is the major source of international rights, which must ensure peace and development. That also concerns the information society," he insisted.


According to Raffarin, these international rules must cover technical questions -- such as the attribution of web addresses and management of domain names -- as well as the protection of intellectual property.


This would guarantee "network security" and "deal with content while respecting freedom (of _expression_)."


The United States and other countries argue that governance of the Internet should be left in private hands, namely the California-based Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN (news - web sites)).
*******************************
Reuters Internet Reports
UK Brings in Laws to Fight Junk Email
Thu Dec 11, 1:10 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - New Internet laws come into force in Britain Thursday aimed at combating junk emails sent to unsuspecting users promising anything from a better sex life to untold riches.


Companies will be prevented from sending unsolicited emails to individuals and will be prevented from tracking which web sites Internet users look at without informing them first.


But the new legislation which allows fines of up to 5,000 pounds to be made against companies sending spam mail has already being criticized as too weak.


Mass emails sent to corporate emails will be allowed which is likely to lead to confusion over the rules.


"The whole problem with these laws is that they are geared to spammers being honest and respecting laws. And of course there are no honest spammers -- the whole profession is based on deceit," Steve Linford, founder of anti-spam organization The Spamhaus Project said earlier this week.


Linford said the 5,000 pounds fine was too law.


"This is a bargain for spammers," said Linford. "Some of them make 20,000 to 30,000 pounds per week."


Unwanted messages now account for at least half of all emails.
*******************************
USA Today
Florida man pleads guilty in porn case
Posted 12/11/2003 3:32 AM

NEW YORK (AP)  A Florida man pleaded guilty in federal court Wednesday to charges that he used misspelling or variations of well-known Web sites to direct minors and other unwitting users to pornographic content.
Briefly sobbing after he entered the courtroom, John Zuccarini, 56, of Hollywood, Fla., entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Michael B. Mukasey on Wednesday in Manhattan.

Zuccarini admitted to 49 counts of using domain names to direct minors to nudity or sexually explicit content, each punishable with up to four years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The charges cover a four-month period this year, following the passage of the Truth in Domain Names Act, which took effect in April.

He also pleaded guilty to one count of possession of 12 images of child pornography on his laptop, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

As part of plea agreement with prosecutors, the U.S. Attorney's Office has recommended that Zuccarini face a sentence of 30 months to 37 months, or about three years. Sentencing is scheduled for Feb. 20.

Zuccarini, who owned at least 3,000 Internet addresses, was arrested in September at a Hollywood, Fla., hotel, where he had lived for about 10 months. (Related story: Feds arrest Florida man in online porn scheme)

Prosecutors said many of the Internet addresses he owned resembled Web sites of interest to children. One example was www.dinseyland.com.

Other well-known companies with Web addresses mimicked by Zuccarini's sites include Yahoo, Time Warner's America Online division and Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Associated Press and The Wall Street Journal.

Prosecutors said Zuccarini made between 10 cents and 25 cents for every viewer led to pornographic sites he worked with. He earned as much as $1 million annually, according to the U.S. attorney.
*******************************
BBC Online
Growing concern over India's e-waste
Friday, 12 December, 2003, 09:23 GMT

Mountains of e-waste - discarded parts of computers, mobile phones and other consumer electronics equipment - are quietly creating a new environmental problem in India.
Thirty million computers are thrown out every year in the US alone, and many are dumped in India and China.

Some 70% of the heavy metals in landfills come from electrical equipment waste.

Now concerns are being raised on the impact the dumping - particularly evident in India's computer heartland, Delhi - is having on both the country's environment, and its people.

"The problem is that these computers, which are quite old, have a lot of toxic material in them," Ravi Agraval, leader of campaign group Toxic Links, told BBC World Service's One Planet programme.

"They have things like mercury, lead, flame retardants, and PVC-coated copper wire.

"When you try and extract or recondition these computers you release these heavy metals and these chemicals. These are disasters for the environment."

Recycling

E-waste heads to India, China and Bangladesh because computer "recycling" is a good business, with much money to be made.

Computer recycling involves employing people to strip down the computers and extract parts that can be used again in machines to be sold on the high street.

The rest is then burned or dumped, both of which are potentially highly hazardous to the environment.

"The process of extraction uses all kinds of chemicals, like acids - which then get dumped into the soil and go into the groundwater," Mr Agraval said.

"When you burn things like PVC-covered copper wire, you have emissions of very toxic chemicals like dioxins, which get released into the local environment."

There are also fears that the recycling process, an unregulated industry in India, is also very harmful to the health of those employed to do it.

In particular, the job involves exposure to a number of toxic chemicals both as part of the recycling process and within the computers themselves.

"The people actually doing the brunt of the recycling are people on less than half a dollar a day - women and children working in very shanty-like, disastrous, inhuman conditions," Mr Agraval said.

"For them, it's the difference between poison and a livelihood."

He added that a health survey had shown that recyclers regularly suffered from complaints such as respiratory diseases and skin rashes.

"It's difficult to say when you're in that state of poverty what really affects what, but certainly they are people on the edge, and any such exposure can't be doing them any good."

Brand change

Such complaints have led to calls for regulation on the way computers are recycled, including workers potentially having to wear masks.

Mr Agraval emphasised that change needed to come from brands, which could instruct their suppliers to be more environmentally friendly.

The brands could also change some of the components in their own products, he said.

In Europe, manufacturers will have to eliminate such harmful substances inside the machines by 2006.

Some companies have already been offering to take back and recycle the computers themselves.

"Today, consumers are approaching us to take [the computer] in, but in the future with the new legislation, they will be able to dispose of it at the local municipality waste site," said Klaus Hieronymi, from Hewlett Packard's European Environmental Programme.

"The industry will have to organise that it is picked up there and put into the right recycling process."

He said that Hewlett Packard was also attempting to reduce the levels of cadmium and mercury in its products in preparation for the legislation, which comes into force on 1 January 2006.

Almost half of one range now did not contain a mercury lamp, he said.

Little money

Meanwhile in India, Mahinder Agowal, who represents the All Delhi Computer Traders Association, said that the risk to employees who recycled computers was relatively small.

"Out of the 2,000 shops most are in a good condition," he argued.

"Only some - very few - are in a bad condition. That happens in any market.

"If you go to a cigarette shop you wouldn't expect it to be in a good condition, so I feel most of the shops are fine."

However, one recycling shop visited by One Planet reporter Richard Hollingham - and credited by Mr Agowal's organisation - was clearly cramped with strong-smelling chemicals in the air.

Mr Agowal defended his organisation's members, arguing that many of them had set up business with very little money.

"Each will conduct business according to his own resources," he said. "We can't interfere with that."
*******************************
CNN Online
Electronic voting no magic bullet
Specialists seek input of academia, technology, election officials
By Marsha Walton
CNN
Friday, December 12, 2003 Posted: 6:38 AM EST (1138 GMT)

GAITHERSBURG, Maryland (CNN) -- After the debacle of the dimpled ballots and "hanging chads" of the 2000 presidential race, many election officials looked to technology to come to their rescue.

They rushed to buy new, high-tech electronic voting equipment, expecting features such as touch screens to prove more reliable than older systems' punch cards.

But at a sometimes boisterous meeting of election officials, computer scientists and voting machine vendors this week in the Washington suburb of Gaithersburg, it seems clear that technology will not solve all.

Several well-publicized flaws in "e-voting," or electronic voting, systems have not led to improvements, said Harvard University computer professor Rebecca Mercuri.

"When such problems are exposed, no one appears to be held accountable," Mercuri said.

"Officials are not removed from their posts, fired or sent to trial; vendors are not banned from participation; equipment is not recalled; standards are not rewritten; and elections are not re-held," she said.

For example, strange flaws, she said, occurred this year in California, Virginia and Indiana.

The gathering at the National Institute of Standards and Technology illustrates that testing, certifying and implementing new voting technology takes place in a kind of multilevel, bureaucratic maze.

A measure called the Help America Vote Act of 2002, known as HAVA, was passed after the Bush-Gore race of 2000 turned into such a spectacle.

But getting the most accurate, secure and budget-friendly voting equipment is not just a matter of having an army of scientific experts at the NIST gathering set the standards. NIST, a part of the U.S. Commerce Department, doesn't have the authority to enforce any of its guidelines.

"I want to stress that NIST is a nonregulatory agency, and we recognize that our role is limited," said Arden Bement, NIST's director, as he addressed those attending the meeting titled "Building Trust and Confidence in Voting Systems."

And it's not always pretty.

"Quite often, standards development begins as a highly contentious process because people represent a variety of interests," Bement said.

Colorado Secretary of State Donetta Davidson stressed the human side -- rather than just the technological challenges -- of improving voting systems.

She said the average age of her poll workers and election judges is about 70. And no matter how good the equipment is, those people have to make it work.

"We need to develop a team [that brings together] the scientists and the common people," said Davidson, who is also the treasurer of the National Association of Secretaries of State.

"I would like everybody that is one of these scientists to be an election judge and help in running an election so they'd know and understand it, and I think that would help."

Other election officials appear a little more optimistic.

Tom Wilkey of the National Association of State Election Directors said U.S. voters should have a basic trust in the election system.

"I think they should be very confident. No one wants to fail. What NIST brings to the table is the ability to bring the very best in academia, technology and elections to work together," Wilkey said.

Electronic voting machine vendors are vocal in asserting that their systems are secure.

"In order to allay some fears, we have developed a paper-receipt printer that goes with these machines that is completely 'retrofit-able' to our machines," said Russell Huffman of Sequoia Voting Systems.

Federal legislation has been introduced to make a paper trail a mandatory part of every electronic voting machine, as a backup to technology and another tool to ensure accuracy.

To help deal with some harsh criticism about e-voting concerns, some vendors have decided to come up with their own working group, known as the Election Technology Council. The six vendors will work with the Information Technology Association of America to address issues of security and ethics.

But don't look for a lot of changes and upgrades during the 2004 presidential election. Change comes slowly in these multiple levels of government.

"Really, it's going to be 2006 before we see any really updated equipment with updated standards," said Harvard's Mercuri.
*******************************
Computerworld
Rep. Putnam keeps pressure on vendors for better security

He held out the threat of cybersecurity legislation if they don't act

Story by Dan Verton

DECEMBER 11, 2003 ( COMPUTERWORLD ) - WASHINGTON -- Legislation that would require publicly traded companies to conduct independent security audits and detail the results in their annual reports could be revived as early as next spring if a special vendor task force fails to produce a viable alternative.
That was the message this week from Rep. Adam Putnam (R-Fla.) after the release of his subcommittee's annual report on government cybersecurity efforts (see story). Putnam, chairman of the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Technology, failed in his attempt to introduce the legislation last month and instead formed the task force.

Most federal agencies received low grades from the subcommittee for failing to protect their computer networks from hackers and other cybercriminals. In a detailed statement after the report was released Tuesday, Putnam blamed the poor state of cybersecurity equally on government and corporate users and on the IT vendor community.

"While some burden is on the shoulders of the user, I feel strongly that a significant burden falls on the shoulders of the hardware, software, operating system manufacturers and ISPs," he said. "These entities until recently have paid insufficient attention to educating consumers as to the importance of security. While billions of dollars have been spent to advertise the benefits of products, such as speed and ease of use, the security component has been neglected."

Putnam also called for the software developer community to deliver software that is "secure out of the box," with all security settings turned on by default. And he wants the vendor community to improve the quality of products being sold in the marketplace, with a specific focus on built-in security features and patch management. Legislation may be required to make automated patch distribution available to all users of all products, he said.

"While software is certainly complicated, with millions of lines of code, there are just some basics that clearly aren't being addressed," he said, citing estimates by the National Institute of Standards and Technology that software bugs and errors cost the U.S. economy $59.5 billion per year. "If the industry doesn't act, Congress will be forced to."

Last month, Putnam tabled the Corporate Information Security Accountability Act of 2003, after, in his words, "numerous companies and associations approached me and asked if we, Congress, would provide the private sector a chance to do this on their own without government regulation"(see story).

As a result, Putnam formed the Corporate Information Security Working Group, including representatives from the Information Technology Association of America, the Business Software Alliance, the Business Roundtable, the SANS Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. So far, the members of the working group have met twice in an effort to come up with a set of information security best practices and guiding principles that could be adopted voluntarily by the private sector.

"I'm hopeful that we can reach a successful conclusion by later winter or early spring," said Putnam.

"The time for action is now. The time for talk has passed," said a senior aide to Putnam. "It's time to coalesce around an action plan, and all of the people who have accountability need to be a part of that plan."

Speaking Dec. 3 at the inaugural U.S. Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity Summit in Palo Alto, Calif., Amit Yoran, director of the National Cybersecurity Division at the DHS, acknowledged that there are serious "questions we face in software reliability."

Art Coviello, president and CEO of RSA Security Inc. in Bedford, Mass., said in an interview on that same day that the "obligation" already exists in the vendor community to ensure the security and integrity of the Internet, but he argued that regulation isn't needed.

"Companies aren't going to use the Internet if it's unsafe," Coviello said. "It's incumbent upon the technology companies to start that process."
*******************************
Los Angeles Times
Men Face Charges Under Spam Law
From Reuters
December 12, 2003

Virginia authorities said Thursday that they had arrested and charged a North Carolina man for allegedly sending unwanted e-mail, in the first use of a new state anti-spam law that could bring penalties of 20 years in prison.

Virginia Atty. Gen. Jerry Kilgore said Jeremy Jaynes was arrested Thursday in Raleigh, N.C., and charged with four counts of using fraudulent means to transmit spam. Kilgore also said officials were in negotiations for the surrender of a second man, Richard Rutowski, on the same charges.

Jaynes and Rutowski are charged with violating limits on the number of messages a marketer can send and with falsifying routing information. Both acts are illegal under a Virginia law that carries penalties of one to five years in prison and fines of as much as $2,500 on each count.

Virginia officials charged that the two men sent more than 100,000 messages in a 30-day period this summer touting penny stocks, low mortgage rates and software to erase Internet browsing records.

Anti-spam group Spamhaus said Jaynes ranks as the eighth-worst spammer in the world. Neither Jaynes nor Rutowski could be reached for comment.

Although the suspects are based in North Carolina, Virginia is asserting jurisdiction because the pair sent messages through computers located in the state.

About 50% of the world's Internet traffic passes through Virginia, home to big companies such as Time Warner Inc.'s America Online unit and WorldCom Inc.

Spam has grown from a minor annoyance to a major threat to the stability of the Internet, experts say. It makes up more than half of all e-mail traffic. AOL blocks as many as 2.4 billion spams each day, a company spokesman said.

At least 36 states have some sort of spam law on the books, and President Bush is expected to sign the first national measure into law as early as next week.

Internet service providers including AOL and EarthLink Inc. have sued spammers for damages, and New York Atty. Gen. Eliot Spitzer charged a Buffalo man this year with violating identity theft and forgery laws for allegedly sending spam. That charge could carry as many as seven years in prison.
*******************************