[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Clips January 17, 2003
- To: "Lillie Coney":;, Gene Spafford <spaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;, John White <white@xxxxxxxxxx>;, Jeff Grove <jeff_grove@xxxxxxx>;, goodman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;, David Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>;, glee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;, Andrew Grosso<Agrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;, ver@xxxxxxxxx;, lillie.coney@xxxxxxx;, v_gold@xxxxxxx;, harsha@xxxxxxx;, KathrynKL@xxxxxxx;, akuadc@xxxxxxxxxxx;, computer_security_day@xxxxxxx;, waspray@xxxxxxxxxxx;
- Subject: Clips January 17, 2003
- From: Lillie Coney <lillie.coney@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:34:51 -0500
Clips January 17, 2003
ARTICLES
Military worried about Web leaks
FTC Targets International License Scam
Librarians Split on Sharing Info
FCC: Open up TV waves to wireless
Technology Center Aims to Close 'Digital Divide'
Adm. Doran promotes biometrics, joint training
'Hello, SSA, it's me'
Firm picked for USAJobs overhaul
Critical infrastructure chief leaves Commerce post
Piracy, CD-burning contributing to music industry's woes
***************************
CNET.com
Military worried about Web leaks
By Declan McCullagh
January 16, 2003, 3:58 PM PT
WASHINGTON--The U.S. Defense Department is worried that sensitive
information remains exposed on its Web sites.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned in a directive sent to military
units this week that too much unclassified but worrisome material was
popping up on the Web, and said Al Qaeda and other foes were sure to take
advantage of it.
The directive, drafted as the U.S. is readying troops for a possible attack
on Iraq, reminded military Webmasters they must adhere to the department's
1998 policies and procedures.
Rumsfeld's order further restricts what information will be publicly
available on military sites, effectively tightening controls that have been
in place for at least five years and that became far more strict after the
terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
"An Al Qaeda training manual recovered in Afghanistan states: 'Using public
sources openly and without resorting to illegal means, it is possible to
gather at least 80 percent of information about the enemy,'" Rumsfeld
wrote. "At more than 700 gigabytes, the DoD Web-based data makes a vast,
readily available source of information on DoD plans, programs and
activities. One must conclude our enemies access DoD Web sites on a regular
basis."
Steven Aftergood, an analyst at the Federation of American Scientists who
works to limit government secrecy, says that Rumsfeld's order is too broad.
"I'm concerned that it sends a chilling signal that will only accelerate
the withdrawal of public information from the Web," Aftergood said. "If he
had said anything like operational plans should not be on the Web, I'd be
hard pressed to disagree with that. But what he said is that anything that
might be useful to an adversary should not be on the Web. And that is
overreaching, because anything could be useful to an adversary."
The Federation of American Scientists, which was founded in 1945 by
Manhattan Project scientists, removed hundreds of documents from its vast
archive of military information after the Sept. 11 attacks. But Aftergood
said the information included photos of military bases and building
schematics that represented only a small fraction of the total the group
makes available to the public.
There have been no confirmed reports about classified information making
its way to military sites, but Rumsfeld said he was concerned about other
categories he dubbed "sensitive" or "for official use only." Rumsfeld's
directive was first reported by InsideDefense.com.
Rumsfeld said that 1,500 instances of such public distribution have been
spotted in the last year. Those appearances could violate the 1998 DoD
policy, which says: "A DoD Web site may not post For Official Use Only
information, or information not specifically cleared and approved for
public release unless it employs adequate security and access controls."
Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration has "vastly expanded
the zone of secrecy that surrounds the White House and most of the federal
government," according to an October 2002 report from the advocacy group
OMB Watch. The report says that thousands of documents and tremendous
amounts of data have been removed from government sites, including airport
safety data, environmental data, and information that remains available on
private-sector sites.
In an October 2001 memorandum distributed throughout the government,
Attorney General John Ashcroft formally reduced the amount of information
federal agencies would make available. Ashcroft wrote that in nearly all
cases, the Justice Department would seek to defend an agency's decision not
to release records requested under the Freedom of Information Act.
*******************************
Associated Press
FTC Targets International License Scam
Thu Jan 16, 1:59 PM ET
By DAVID HO, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - Federal regulators are accusing six marketers of selling over
the Internet bogus international driver's permits, often to immigrants
looking for legitimate identification documents.
The Federal Trade Commission said Thursday it was seeking injunctions to
prevent the marketers from selling the fake documents. The cases were filed
this month in federal courts in California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New
York and the District of Columbia.
International driver's permits are intended to help people with valid
driver's licenses drive in foreign countries that have signed a U.N.
traffic convention, the FTC said. The permit is a booklet that translates a
government-issued driver's license into different languages. It is not a
substitute for a license.
Only the American Automobile Association and American Automobile Touring
Alliance can issue the permits in the United States.
Howard Beales, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said
there is no evidence of a connection between the fake documents and
terrorism, but the agency is concerned the permits could be a first step
for people seeking to create more elaborate false identities.
"This is a fairly easy document to get as a fake ID," Beales said at a news
conference.
The FTC charged that the marketers falsely claimed the permits were a
legitimate alternative to state-issued driver's licenses, allowing users to
drive legally in the United States even if they have suspended or revoked
licenses. The marketers also promoted the permits as acceptable substitutes
for government-issued photo identification.
"Victims don't necessarily know they're victims until pretty late in the
game," Beales said. "They might be arrested for driving without a license
or presenting a false ID to a police officer."
He said the marketers used e-mail spam and Web sites to sell the permits
for between $65 and $375. Real permits are just $10.
Beales said he did not know how many bogus permits had been sold.
"These scams lead innocent travelers to spend hundreds of dollars for false
documents," said Sandra Hughes, vice president of AAA Travel. "Even worse,
they encourage unlicensed drivers to return to our highways, endangering
all of us."
The FTC filed complaints against the following people and companies, some
of which operated under multiple names:
_Yad Abraham, also known as Tim Thorn and Timothy Thorn, and doing business
as Sharpthorn Internet Solutions and Internex.
_Jaguar Business Concepts, doing business as Libertymall.com and Cheyenne
Investment Alliance, and Jacqueline Demer as a Cheyenne manager.
_Jordan Maxwell, also known as Russell Pine, doing business as BBCOA, BBC
of America, Better Book and Cassette of America, and Vic Varjabedian, also
known as Varouj Varjabedian.
_William Scott Dion, individually and doing business as PT Resource Center
and PTRC, also known as Don Glessner.
_Carlton Press Inc., Carlton Press Ltd., and Kim Fleming Bo Weiss.
_the Institute for International Licensing, Aladdin Financial Management,
University Systems, and Wheelie International Limited.
********************************
Wired News
Librarians Split on Sharing Info
02:35 PM Jan. 16, 2003 PT
In the year following the passage of the Patriot Act, librarians' response
to law enforcement requests for patrons' records has been sharply divided,
according to a nationwide survey.
The Patriot Act allows investigators to seize patrons' book-borrowing and
Internet-surfing records to investigate terrorist leads; it also prohibits
library staff from publicizing law enforcement requests for such materials.
The survey (PDF) of 906 libraries by the Library Research Center at the
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign found that in the year following
the Sept. 11 attacks, federal and local law enforcement agents visited at
least 545 libraries to inquire after patrons' records.
When asked to voluntarily forfeit patrons' records, roughly half the
librarians cooperated with investigators without demanding a subpoena or
court order, the study found.
"What surprised me most was real tension between personal beliefs and
concern about what librarians are obligated to do under the law," said
center director Leigh Estabrook.
Estabrook said librarians -- traditionally fierce guardians of free speech
and information access -- have been forced to juggle conflicting
obligations: protecting patrons' privacy as good librarians and
collaborating with law enforcement requests as good citizens.
"There's so much emphasis in the media of needing to be fearful of
terrorist activity," said Estabrook. "It's no wonder that some librarians
have bought into those fears."
In the collaborative vein, some libraries have begun to ask patrons to show
identification before using Internet terminals, while others have withdrawn
materials that could be used to plan terrorist attacks, such as materials
on bomb making or bio-terrorism.
Nevertheless, 60 percent of the librarians who responded said they believed
the gag order precluding them from publicizing visits from investigators
was an abridgement of their First Amendment rights. Indeed, Estabrook
allows that the gag order may have skewed the survey results.
The American Library Association, a trade group representing the nation's
libraries, has also denounced the Patriot Act.
"I think it's a serious issue that some people are voluntarily cooperating
with law enforcement," said Emily Sheketoff, the executive director of the
Washington, D.C., office of the ALA.
*****************************
News.com
FCC: Open up TV waves to wireless
By Richard Shim
January 16, 2003, 2:51 PM PT
The Federal Communications Commission is quietly considering opening the
television broadcast spectrum for use by other wireless devices, including
Wi-Fi products.
The proposal, revealed in a notice of inquiry adopted last month, would
allow devices using unlicensed spectrum--bandwidth not licensed to
broadcasters--to operate in the TV broadcast spectrum. However, they would
tap into only those parts of the TV spectrum not being used and only be
allowed to do this when they wouldn't interfere with authorized services.
The Dec. 20 notice will take effect when it is published later this month
in the Federal Register, said an FCC representative. At that point, the
agency will kick off a 75-day comment period.
The regulatory body is expecting a dogfight from TV broadcasters who in the
past have been very protective of their territory--opposition that could
derail the proposed changes or delay them.
"We're in for a bit of a bumpy ride," said Alan Scrime, chief of the policy
and rules division in the FCC's office of engineering and technology. "TV
broadcasters are an influential bunch. We're not expecting this to be a
real quick one."
The FCC has been pushing TV broadcasters toward digital television, in
order to free up the analog TV spectrum for uses such as wireless home
networking technology.
The agency is looking at TV spectrum because it provides significant
amounts of bandwidth per channel. In addition, the frequencies and amount
of unused TV spectrum varies in different regions, leaving more
opportunities for use, according to the notice.
Current 802.11b-based, or Wi-Fi, wireless home networking products operate
in the 2.4GHz band and can interfere with other devices--such as cordless
phones--in the same band. Expanding the spectrum of unlicensed devices
would mitigate many interference issues, and could pave the way for new
types of devices that can operate in other bands.
Scrime said that manufacturers have been developing products that can sense
when they would interfere with other devices.
The FCC and specifically its chairman, Michael Powell, have promoted the
adoption of broadband access by consumers. Wireless home networking
technology has been viewed by the regulatory body as a significant
complement to broadband, because it makes the service more valuable by
allowing multiple consumers to share access wirelessly.
Others in Washington have been promoting the use of Wi-Fi technology. Late
Tuesday, Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and George Allen, R-Va. proposed
the Jumpstart Broadband Act, which would allocate additional radio spectrum
for unlicensed use by wireless broadband devices and add wireless
technology as a third method of improving the establishment of broadband
access.
The notice of inquiry to be published does not specifically identify Wi-Fi
wireless home networking technology. However, as technology that uses
unlicensed spectrum, Wi-Fi products would get a boost.
Wi-Fi products operate in the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, which are unlicensed
parts of the radio spectrum. Analog TV stations operate in 6MHz channels
and the FCC is targeting the 54MHz to 72MHz, 76MHz to 88MHz, 174MHz to
216MHz and 470MHz to 806MHz bands.
"Wi-Fi should benefit, if this comes to pass," Scrime said.
The point of the notice and similar efforts by the FCC are to make more
efficient use of the radio spectrum, as wireless devices become more
popular among manufacturers and consumers.
"The FCC wants to encourage the sharing of spectrum and take advantage of
it when it's not being used, as long as there is not interference," Scrime
said. "Long term, we want to make sure there is enough of it available so
that it isn't crowded to the point where it doesn't work."
********************************
Los Angeles Times
Technology Center Aims to Close 'Digital Divide'
The Pacoima facility offers job training and Internet access for adults, as
well as homework assistance for youths.
By Stephanie Stassel
January 17 2003
A computer center that opened Thursday in the northeast San Fernando Valley
is more than just a place to type a resume.
The Pacoima Community Technology Center offers training for medical office
jobs as well as online college classes for adults and computer instruction
and homework help for children.
The center houses the Valley Family Technology Project, a $3-million
government-industry partnership launched in October 2001 to help close the
so-called "digital divide" in the community.
"We're in the heart of Pacoima, where many people who face obstacles to
employment live," said Mario Matute, director of the project.
The center, at 13630 Van Nuys Blvd., is two doors down from the office of
Los Angeles City Council President Alex Padilla, who was one of the driving
forces behind it.
The facility has a lab with 20 laptop computers and 22 flat-screen desktop
units, plus three additional computers for area residents who want to write
e-mail or surf the Internet.
Converting and furnishing the former discount store cost $270,500, said
Dixon Slingerland, director of the Youth Policy Institute, a nonprofit
agency that runs the Valley Family Technology Project.
At the new center, adults training for a medical office career will
complete three months of English, math and computer classes before taking
on a three-month paid internship at a local hospital.
Leyda Carrillo, who began studying this week at the center, called the
facility "a safe, comfortable place to be."
"Everything is brand-new," said Carrillo, 23, who wants to become a
licensed vocational nurse. "They want to help you. They talk to you and are
really familiar with you."
In addition to job training, the center offers online courses through
Cerritos College for 45 adults who are working toward high school diplomas
or simply want to further their education.
Beginning Feb. 18, the center will have a free after-school program for
youths struggling in the classroom. And later this year, computer and
literacy courses will be offered for seniors.
The center, which has bilingual instructors and materials, is open from
7:30 a.m. to 9 p.m. weekdays and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturdays. The phone
number is (818) 899-5550.
*********************************
Government Computer News
1/17/03
Adm. Doran promotes biometrics, joint training
By Dawn S. Onley
SAN DIEGOAdm. Walter F. Doran, commander of the Pacific Fleet, said the
Navy has set up a test bed in San Diego for faster development of command,
control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance technologies to protect personnel.
He said the Naval Air Station North Island is testing a biometric
identification system for base access called Smart Gate, which can operate
unstaffed. The Navy is also testing vehicle bar coding, the Common Access
smart card for entry, automatic surveillance and swimmer detection systems
as the service prepares for war with Iraq.
Doran, speaking at the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics
Association's conference here yesterday, said the Navy is also working on
advanced underwater sensors and distribution of a common tactical picture
across different platforms.
"The technical community is on the front line in this global war on
terrorism," Doran said. "That's our asymmetric advantage. We will turn to
you [technology vendors] with our requirements, and you will develop the
systems and technology. We will train and lead our sailors, and they will
operate the most advanced systems in the world."
Doran said the Joint Forces Command advocates combined training of the
military services with new technologies. Last month, a joint task force of
400 went to Japan for a USS Blue Ridge exercise. The task force has members
from each of the services, dispersed across the country from Alaska to
Maryland. They communicate with each other daily via the Internet and
tailored Web sites, he said.
"Web tools are in place to bring new members up to speed, and their
training is reviewed and managed remotely," Doran said. "All of this can be
accomplished while members continue with their full-time day jobs."
***********************************
Government Computer News
01/17/03
'Hello, SSA, it's me'
By Susan M. Menke
The Social Security Administration made "a huge leap" in efficiency by
letting employers file W-2 wage reports online at www.ssa.gov/employer, and
now the agency is testing voiceprint authentication of filers by telephone,
SSA project manager Chuck Liptz said today.
Until now, SSA has authorized each electronic filer by requiring a
supervisor's approval and sending a personal identification number by
postal or e-mail. In the voiceprint test, which began Jan. 6, "We'll see if
employers think it's an easier way to do business," Liptz said. "We don't
want to implement technology without including the people it's going to
affect." The test will run for about three months, he said.
SSA received about 100 million wage reports from employers for tax year 2001.
So far, a couple of dozen employers filing their 2002 W-2s have volunteered
to record their voiceprints reading employer ID number and other required
information, which they later repeat over the phone to be authenticated
during each Web filing session. The combination of PIN and voiceprint is
legally binding, Liptz said, and the voiceprint file size is "just a few
bytes." A survey at the end of the voiceprinting call has returned mostly
favorable results, he said.
Authentify Inc. of Chicago helped SSA set up the biometric authentication
test. Authentify's announcement said the "no training, no software, no
hardware" approach will cut costs and could become a model for other
government online authentication projects.
*******************************
Federal Computer Week
Firm picked for USAJobs overhaul
BY Colleen O'Hara
Jan. 15, 2003
The Office of Personnel Management has awarded a contract to TMP Worldwide
Government Services Inc. to redesign and operate the USAJobs Web site, the
agency announced Jan. 14.
TMP, the parent company of online job portal Monster.com, will be called
upon to improve the look and operation of USAJobs. The first improvements
-- to be completed early this year -- will include an enhanced search
engine so job seekers can search for a position in a variety of ways, a
resume builder tool and online vacancy announcements that are shorter and
easier to read.
Other changes that job-seekers can expect from the site include:
* A data mining feature that allows federal managers to locate job
candidates by sifting through resumes on file at USAJobs.
* A universal resume development and submission function that is compatible
with all agency automated application processing systems.
* An application tracking feature for applicants.
"There is a window of opportunity now for the government to take advantage
of the downturn in the private sector to attract individuals to public
service that may not have been interested at other times," said Jocelyn
Talbot, senior vice president of Monster Government Solutions, a division
of TMP Worldwide Government Services. Enhancing USAJobs will help to
attract the best and the brightest job seekers, she said.
******************************
Government Executive
January 16, 2003
Critical infrastructure chief leaves Commerce post
From National Journal's Technology Daily
John Tritak, director of the Commerce Department's Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Office, has left the government and will not take a position at
the new Homeland Security Department, as many in the high-tech industry had
expected.
"This was something he was planning to do for awhile," a department
spokesman said of his departure, which was final Jan. 10.
Tritak joined the Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office, which is
responsible for working with the business community to improve computer
security, in August 1999. He joined the office from the law firm of Verner,
Liipfer, Bernhard, McPherson and Hand, where he worked with domestic and
international clients in the areas of defense, telecommunications and
transportation. Before that, he held several senior advisory posts within
the State Department.
The Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office is heavily involved with
private sector outreach and attempts to impress upon the companies that
control 90 percent of the nation's infrastructure the necessity of
protecting their information systems.
During his tenure, Tritak was responsible for coordinating the creation and
implementation of the "National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure
Protection." Tritak also was key in developing Project Matrix, which
federal agencies must use to determine their reliance on critical
infrastructures.
A department spokesman said Tritak is not likely to be replaced, as the
Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office will be absorbed into Homeland
Security in March.
*****************************
USA Today
Piracy, CD-burning contributing to music industry's woes
January 17, 2003
LONDON (Reuters) Global recorded music sales look set to fall for the
fourth straight year in 2003 thanks to piracy and the economic downturn,
and its bosses are desperate for solutions.
Executives gathering for the global music industry conference Midem in
southern France this weekend know it's make or break time.
The bruised industry needs a new formula as fans increasingly spend their
disposable income on video games and "burn" their own CD compilations while
labels desperately seek a new crop of long-lasting stars.
Major music labels have so far responded by slashing jobs, axing B-list
artists and trimming back their bloated businesses. However, the industry
appears no closer to a long-term solution than last year and talk of
consolidation among the big five music companies is growing louder by the day.
"2003 will be the tipping point. The fundamentals continue to deteriorate
and consolidation will have to happen," said Michael Nathanson, media
analyst at U.S.-based investment research firm Sanford Bernstein.
Forecasts see sales sliding another 6% in 2003 a fall felt most by the big
five music giants Universal, Sony, Warner, EMI and BMG which account for
70% of sales.
That comes on top of an estimated 9% fall in 2002, a 5% dip in 2001 and a
1.4% fall in 2000.
Pirates ahoy!
Critics assert that the age-old business model of merely selling physical
copies of music to the masses is hopelessly out of date in a digital era of
track downloads and song-swapping on Internet services like Kazaa and Morpheus.
Music execs, meanwhile, remain cautious about the Net, held back by
technological, economic and legal limitations to putting their entire
repertoire online.
The fear persists that the popularity of song-swapping services and the
ease of CD-copying will give birth to a sort of doomsday
scenario generations of music fans who refuse to pay. Unsurprisingly,
piracy will be a key topic at this year's Midem.
Trade organization International Federation of the Phonographic Industry
(IFPI) has gone to battle against the proliferation of music bootlegs,
primarily by pouring money and resources into helping police shut down the
pirate operations.
The IFPI estimates the market for bootlegged music, whether it be
mass-produced in CD-pressing factories or burned onto recordable CDs from a
university dorm, was $4.3 billion in 2001 with sales of pirated discs
hitting 950 million units.
The toll of Internet song-trading networks is harder to quantify. According
to an IFPI study, at any one time, there are five million users on
peer-to-peer networks swapping 900 million files.
Cooperative spirit
Over the past year, the majors exhibited a rare piece of cooperative
spirit, making available more of their tunes to subscription-based music
download services Pressplay and MusicNet, plus to third-party players such
as the UK's OD2.
But the industry-backed services, with their relatively meager music
selection and downloading limitations, have failed to slow the popularity
of the free services.
IFPI Chairman and CEO Jay Berman will issue a call to arms in his annual
address on Sunday, asking the majors to step up their online activities.
"This is a time when different sectors of the music industry, for all their
diverging interests, have one big common interest: namely to develop a new
online music business and to fight piracy," Berman told Reuters.
Critics are dubious.
"The politics at the major labels hasn't changed. The guy who puts his neck
out on the line could get fired. Whereas the guy who keeps his head down is
safe, and he gets to keep his BMW for another year," said Paul Myers,
founder of Wippit.com, a subscription download site.
Consolidation talk
In the meantime, the five major music companies need to find ways of
cutting costs further, but European regulators showed a distaste for
further consolidation among the big five in the last attempt in 2000.
However, the subsequent collapse in the industry could encourage them to be
more accepting now, observers believe.
Of the five majors, EMI is the only music company that is not part of a
bigger conglomerate. EMI, home to ColdPlay and Pink Floyd, has been
peppered by merger speculation of late, propelling the stock to a 20% gain
in the past two weeks as reports of a BMG tie-up surfaced.
As the industry looks for a new business model and possibly new
combinations, finding the next chart-topping newcomer, such as last year's
teen rocker Avril Lavigne, will be key. Still, landing the next big thing
isn't likely to draw attention from the industry's dismal business fortunes.
"The outlook is miserable. It's going to take at least two years to get out
of this and a lot of people will disappear in the process," one music
executive predicted.
*****************************
Lillie Coney
Public Policy Coordinator
Association for Computing Machinery
2120 L Street, NW, Suite 510
Washington, DC 20037
202-478-6124 (phone)
202-478-6313 (fax)